The Trial of Petyr Baelish | Every Hidden Detail You Missed

When does Sansa ever admit she was wrong about Jeoffery and Balish? She still wants power, still thinks she is a queen. 

The Most Astonishing Theory of Black Holes Ever Proposed

If so, then wouldn't you come out the opposite side, going back into the anti-matter universe? If time and space are "flipped" into the other side of the mirror universe, which direction/dimension of space would time turn into? Perhaps all this happens only at plank-lengths, and so the 'flipping' is a quantum effect that simply creates mass out of motion, and explodes mass into motion on the other side? If all the mass is turned into light (energy) at the horizon surface, but is trapped at that surface until, at some point in time, it 'boils' off in Hawking radiation, then why would you need an 'antimatter universe' in parallel? If mass is 'rotated' in space-time and turned into energy (light) in ALL SPACE DIRECTIONS, but the 'black holes' themselves somehow retain that mass, but only at the event horizon, then doesn't time slow for the matter falling in, from the perspective of the outside observer? And if so, wouldn't those falling into the event horizon see the entire future of their universe (if they are looking back) before they are annihilated? Essentially, those falling into the black hole would watch the end of time and shift into light along a 2D surface without a boundary, which, since photons do not experience time, sounds much like a big bang event. CPT = Charge, Parity, Time I would like to see some of the 4D matrix calculations that he's speaking about and check their symmetry and see how they 'flip' or are not-symmetric at the event-horizion (or singularity). If the wavelength of the light created by the annihilation of matter at the event horizon is shorter than the Planck length, then how is that not an infinity/singularity? Which is another form of catastrophic breakdown of space-time matter/energy quantum mechanics. How could the mirror universe evolve EXACTLY as ours did in the mathematical/statistical space of reverse entropy (given anti-matter) given the random probability of quantum uncertainty? The macro-level emergence of life, intelligence, information, and consciousness doesn't seem to be dependent upon quantum mechanics; in fact, it could evolve virtually inside a computer (binary) simulation, or any N-based mathematical universe. So, why do we think that some analog/quantum universe where time and space can be bent and even 'flipped' at the boundaries, is the 'reality', if our brain-in-a-box could be simulated? If anti-matter is 'attractive' gravitationally, just like normal matter, then does it also cause an equivalent to the 'cosmological constant' (dark energy), or is that a function of space-time? We need more experimental data. What is 'Quentencence'?

How 100 Bodyweight Squats Changes the Human Physique.

Nemik's eulogy for Renee Nicole Good.

Why Light Speed Is The LIMIT? What Feynman Uncovered Will COLLAPSE Your ...

ICE Kills Woman With Gunshots To The Face

Trump calls Jan 6 a “day of love.” This bodycam footage shows otherwise.

Final Scene of The Series | Superman & Lois | Stream Free on The CW

The 13th Warrior - Viking Prayer

Lo, there do I see my father. Lo, there do I see my mother, and my sisters, and my brothers. Lo, there do I see the line of my people, Back to the beginning Lo, they do call to me. They bid me take my place among them, In the halls of Valhalla, Where the brave may live forever!

Hayley Williams - Glum (Official Video)

I’m Russian. You Were Lied To About Putin.

Why people mistake feelings for moral insight | Alex O'Connor

"Emotivism" is bunk. There may be an emotional (i.e., instinctual) component to moral claims. But ETHICAL ACTION (e.g., right or wrong actions) is RATIONALLY definable OBJECTIVELY within a given CONTEXT. Emotions (instincts) motivate action, and they tend to motivate good (right) actions, because what is good for the individual is often in alignment with what is good for society. Outside any society, right and wrong have no meaning. If you are alone, you can do anything you want and never do wrong; that's why those who wish to do evil first must dehumanize others, because if they are not like you, not human, then your actions don't reflect, and you can pretend your actions are not evil. "Do not do unto others as you would NOT want them to do unto you" doesn't matter if there are no others, or if the others are not your equals. Morality IS subjective, but Ethics is OBJECTIVE, as right action can be defined RATIONALLY (without any plea to supernatural beings or even subjective emotion) within a given CONTEXT (like human life on Earth in the 21st Century). We 'enlightened rationalists', educated as we are, aren't justifying contextual relativism or trying to redefine right and wrong; we are defining an objective ethics so that we can create justice and hold people to account for their actions. Only humans can do evil because only humans have the brains, minds to predict the future and take actions that exhibit freedom of their will. Animals simply express their instincts, and humans are animals, but we have a choice; we can follow our instincts, like animals, or choose to use our rational abilities to choose another action. When people do the wrong thing (as determined by society) we presume they had that choice. We don't presume dogs have that choice. There IS an objective (social) good and bad, right and wrong, within a given context (time and place), but there is no UNIVERSAL ETHICS (rational morality), and MORALITY (subjective ethics) generally appeals to supernatural beings to try and achieve a UNIVERSAL application. People murder all the time in the name of their gods, so murder isn't wrong under a religious (subjective) moral context. But ethically (rationally), murder is wrong under almost all imaginable contexts. Right action is thus rationally definable under almost any given context. Ethics is objective, not emotive.

JD Vance’s Power Network: How Theo Bros and Tech Bros Are Teaming Up

Experts say they are converging on the same anti-democratic playbook. From the Seven Mountains Mandate to "Network State" projects like Highland Rim, we expose how figures like JD Vance, Peter Thiel, and Doug Wilson are planning a theocratic-technocratic future. Gil Duran speaks with Prof. Matthew Boedy, author of "The Seven Mountains Mandate: Exposing the Dangerous Plan to Christianize America and Destroy Democracy": Buy it here: https://www.wjkbooks.com/bookproduct/... And Kiera Butler of Mother Jones, a national correspondent at Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/author/ki... Read: Christian Theo Bros Are Building a Tech Utopia in Appalachia: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/... Please Pre-Order Gil Duran's new book, "The Nerd Reich: Silicon Valley Fascism and The War on Democracy." https://www.simonandschuster.com/book... Subscribe to The Nerd Reich newsletter: https://www.thenerdreich.com/ Follow Gil on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/gilduran.com Follow Matthew Boedy on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/matthewboedy... Follow Kiera Butler on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/kieraevebutl... #jdvance #project2025 #tech #politics #siliconvalley #billionaire #christian #christianity #peterthiel #democracy #podcast #religion #charliekirk

Audience ERUPTS After Comedian Calls Out Religious Hypocrites

Can You Pass The Baseline Test?

For Albert Camus, revolt is a fundamental human response to the absurd condition of life, a "yes" that emerges from a "no" to oppression, asserting human value and solidarity against meaninglessness and tyranny, as explored in The Rebel; it's not just political uprising but a metaphysical stance against despair, exemplified by Sisyphus, who finds meaning in his conscious struggle. Camus distinguished true rebellion (which affirms life and sets limits) from revolution (which often leads to destructive ideologies and new forms of oppression). 

Key Aspects of Camus's Revolt:

• Rooted in the Absurd: Revolt begins with recognizing life's meaninglessness (the Absurd) but refuses suicide or nihilistic despair, instead choosing to live despite it.
• A "Yes" and a "No": A rebel says "no" to injustice and limits but also "yes" to shared human values, creating solidarity.
• Metaphysical vs. Political: He differentiated metaphysical revolt (man against fate/creation) from political revolt (man against man/society) and warned that political revolutions often betray their ideals through violence and ideological excess, becoming revolutions of nihilism.
• The Rebel as Hero (Sisyphus): In The Myth of Sisyphus, Sisyphus rolling a boulder eternally becomes the absurd hero by consciously embracing his fate, finding dignity in his struggle and scorn for the gods.
• Limits and Ethics: True rebellion requires moral limits and a respect for human life, contrasting with revolutionary ideologies that justify mass murder for abstract future goals.
• Rebellion vs. Revolution: Rebellion says "no" to oppression but "yes" to human solidarity and limits; revolution often becomes a justification for total freedom and nihilistic destruction, leading to new tyrannies. 

Watch this video to understand the distinction between revolt and revolution in Camus's work:

How to get REGEN braking from your geared hub motor. Lock that clutch!

So. What's PLUR1BUS all about then?

Beretta APX Frame, Backstrap & Mag Release Change

Investigative Reporter Explains How Trump Dismantled the DOJ

Injustice: How Politics and Fear Vanquished America’s Justice Department, by Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative journalist Carol Leonnig (with and co-author Aaron Davis) will become a historic marker on the fall of the American Empire.

Maybe This Phone ISN’T Just for Criminals - Trying Graphene OS for a Month.